Good Jobs vs Easy Jobs

Forgive me, for this isn’t exactly chess related, but in a way it is.  It’s certainly affecting my chess, or my lack thereof.  It has to do with jobs, namely, the neverending pursuit to get a good one.

We are told almost from birth to get a good job.  Not just that, but a job you love.  “I want you to do what you love,” I heard over and over from my mom.  “If you love your job, then you’ll never work a day in your life.”  That’s a nice sound bite, but it’s a load of crap.

This is inspired by my recent job change.  In January, I left my role as senior instructor at a martial arts dojo and took up the role of law clerk at a local law firm.  There have been a host of changes, as you can imagine.  In the former, I had nearly 20 years experience; in the latter, I have near zero.  One I worked predominately with children; the other I predominately work with millionaires.  That’s about the biggest change you can make from one job.  As you can imagine, it also pays better, which never hurts.

On the downside, and as chess has taught us every move has a downside, I work more hours.  Substantially more.  At karate, I averaged around 33hrs a week, which I suppose barely counts as a full-time job.  At the firm, I clock a minimum 40hrs and hover closer to 50.  This might surprise you, but it’s harder to study chess when you have 17 less hours each week.

It goes beyond just the numbers, though.  I have longer days, and I’m more tired afterwards.  More accurately, I’m mentally drained.  I have lots of energy to do a workout or volunteer at karate afterwards, but much less for solving abstract geometric problems.  So yes, I have less hours, but I also have less energy to to use in those hours.  I also have interests beyond chess, contrary to what this blog may portray.

One reason, and perhaps the reason, I was able to improve from 1800 to 2000+ on chess.com was because I had time.  Most adults don’t have that luxury.  Between work, kids, family, friends and general day-to-day stuff, time disappears.  I used my time, and so when I studied one hour a day for several months, it makes sense that I improved faster than other adults who can only afford an hour a week.

The question then becomes clear: what do you value?  How important is a good job?  I have a good job, even a great job.  It pays the bills, keeps me intellectually stimulated, is never the same as the day before and it has ample room for advancement.  More than a job, it is the beginning of a career.  That’s pretty damn cool.  On the downside, it takes most of my time and energy, and my other interests understandable lag behind.

My old job was … well, let’s not say bad, but it was definitely a job, not a career.  No career potential, little chance of advancement, most days were the same and I sometimes had little to do on the slower days.  On the plus side, I had time.  I could do things, just about anything I want.  During those five years I spent teaching karate, I also: wrote a book (not to mention 400+ days of consecutive blogging), learned to play the piano, learned to draw, learned to juggle, delved deep into object manipulation, read hundreds of books, got in the best shape of my life and the list goes on and on.  My job itself may have been nothing special, but it let me do special things.

This, then, is the dynamic.  What will it be, a good job, a career at the expense of some of your interests?  Or an easy job, something nothing special but lets you pursue your interests every day?  Neither is wrong, as long as you choose it for the right reason.  It’s fully possible, even preferable, to have what others call a dead-end job but to be incredibly happy because you can do everything you want.

Am I happy where I am?  Did I make the right choice?  Good question.  For me, post university, I have lived an ‘interest-focused’ life, and it’s been fun … but there was also the feeling of needing something more, of going beyond my current station.  I am ready to pursue something bigger, if only for the experience.  If this works long term, amazing.  If it doesn’t, I can always go back to what I know works.  It’s win-win … even if it costs my chess time.

You now know why I update less.  I want to promise I’ll do more, but that would be foolish.  I will do what I can, when I can, and if the gift of time ever descends upon me again, believe me, chess will be one of my first destinations.

3 thoughts on “Good Jobs vs Easy Jobs

  1. SeniorPatzer

    Hi SmithyQ,

    What a terrific introspective existential post! I loved reading your thoughtfulness about the multidimensional tradeoffs.

    Curious. What do you think is the meaning and purpose of life? Both in the abstract, and for you individually and personally. In 100 words or less. Just kidding.

  2. JP Post author

    Thanks, SP. I studied philosophy at school, so such analysis comes naturally.

    The meaning of life? Meaning presupposes a level of intelligence, of being understood. If someone says a string of gibberish, or if someone types random letters in a text, we don’t ask what those words mean. It doesn’t even make sense to ask that question. We ask different questions, such as, ‘Did his cat walk across the keyboard or something?’

    The first question, therefore, shouldn’t be whether life has meaning. Rather, it should be if life can be understood, if life has something to interpret. If the answer is negative here, then there is no meaning.

    When I look around at this world, though, I see many things. By and large, I see patterns: night into day and the cycle of the seasons; symmetry in almost all life; millions of species, and yet two eyes, one heart, male and female in all mammals. More than anything, I see order, a logic. The world can be understood. It is not random. Truths can be expressed and understood and applied.

    I know not if there is intelligence behind all this, but I know there is order in all things, or at least all things I have seen. The meaning of life, then, is tied to this order. Embrace it, remain in harmony. That is life.

    Now, what that means practically is a different story, but we philosophers don’t often go there. 😉

  3. Gringo

    The Vital Question by Lane
    I haven’t been able to finish it but it actually defines and gives the reasons as far as he understands for the entire ground up creation of pre-cell life to advanced life and of the need for male/female pairs for procreation.

    It’s gets dense (chemistry etc) despite the authors attempt to keep it simple for the layman.

    Gringo

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.